Progressive Rail Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT SIEMENS ENERGY, INC. and ) PROGRESSIVE RAIL, INC., ) ) Civil No. 3:15-cv-00018-GFVT Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) MEMORANDUM ) OPINION CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ) & ) ORDER Defendant. ) *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.’s Motion for Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees and Bill of Costs. [R. 112; R. 113.] Plaintiff Siemens Energy, Inc. opposes the Motion, arguing that the language of the Blue Anchor Bill’s Himalaya and Indemnity Clauses preclude CSXT from attorneys’ fees.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Contreras v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.