Legal Opinion

Progressive Rail Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided March 17, 2021No. 3:15-cv-00018Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION FRANKFORT SIEMENS ENERGY, INC. and ) PROGRESSIVE RAIL, INC., ) ) Civil No. 3:15-cv-00018-GFVT Plaintiffs, ) ) V. ) MEMORANDUM ) OPINION CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ) & ) ORDER Defendant. ) *** *** *** *** This matter is before the Court on Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.’s Motion for Entitlement to Attorneys’ Fees and Bill of Costs. [R. 112; R. 113.] Plaintiff Siemens Energy, Inc. opposes the Motion, arguing that the language of the Blue Anchor Bill’s Himalaya and Indemnity Clauses preclude CSXT from attorneys’ fees.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Contreras v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API