Legal Opinion

Pask v. Corbitt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1975No. 7518SC445PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

The plaintiff attempts to appeal from an order interlocutory in nature. Such orders are generally considered nonreviewable. 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 157, p. 528; 16 A.L.R. 2d, Appeal-ability of Order With Respect to Motion for Joinder of Additional Parties, §§ 3, 6, pp. 1028-1040; Sprague v. Bond, 111 N.C. 425, 16 S.E. 412 (1892) ; Lane v. Richardson, 101 N.C. 181, 7 S.E. 710 (1888). Plaintiff has, however, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari which we have allowed.

Plaintiff argues that Golden Eagle was not entitled to notice of a motion to make additional parties and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. American Federation of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
  4. Mitchell v. Carborundum Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
  5. Sprague v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. SamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. DeBRUHL v. DeBRUHLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Insight Health Corp. v. Marquis Diagnostic Imaging of Nc, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API