Pask v. Corbitt
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
The plaintiff attempts to appeal from an order interlocutory in nature. Such orders are generally considered nonreviewable. 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 157, p. 528; 16 A.L.R. 2d, Appeal-ability of Order With Respect to Motion for Joinder of Additional Parties, §§ 3, 6, pp. 1028-1040; Sprague v. Bond, 111 N.C. 425, 16 S.E. 412 (1892) ; Lane v. Richardson, 101 N.C. 181, 7 S.E. 710 (1888). Plaintiff has, however, filed a petition for a writ of certiorari which we have allowed.
Plaintiff argues that Golden Eagle was not entitled to notice of a motion to make additional parties and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hagins v. Redevelopment Commission of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. American Federation of LaborDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1963
- Mitchell v. Carborundum Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1947
- Sprague v. . BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. SamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- DeBRUHL v. DeBRUHLCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Insight Health Corp. v. Marquis Diagnostic Imaging of Nc, LLCNorth Carolina Business Court · 2015