Legal Opinion
Aumiller v. University of Delaware
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 21, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-84PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Civil Rights Attorney’s Fee Awards Act of 1976, Pub.L. No. 94-559 [hereinafter “1976 Act”], plaintiff has moved for attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred in the successful litigation of this action. In an earlier opinion, this court held that defendants had infringed plaintiff Aumiller’s first amendment rights in failing, to renew his^teaching contract “because of his statements on the subject of homosexuality which appeared in three newspaper articles.” Aumiller v. University of Delaware, 434 F.Supp. 1273, 1312 (1977). Remedial relief…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rodriguez v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Lindy Bros. Builders, Inc. v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mark Wildman v. Lerner Stores Corporation, Mark Wildman v. Lerner Stores CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Brown v. BathkeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- A. Patrick Tonti v. James C. Petropoulous and Richard B. MetcalfCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Miller v. Apartments And Homes Of New Jersey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Ross v. SaltmarshDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.