Legal Opinion
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 26, 1989No. 88-1308PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
Since 1982 Johnson Controls, Inc. (hereinafter “Johnson Controls” or “Johnson”) has maintained a fetal protection policy designed to prevent unborn children and their mothers from suffering the adverse effects of lead exposure. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW (hereinafter “UAW”), several UAW local unions and a group of individual employees brought suit alleging that this policy violated Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.1 The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Johnson Controls and…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Uaw v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- James v. MaceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023