Legal Opinion

Dolly M. E. Filartiga and Joel Filartiga v. Americo Norberto Pena-Irala

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 30, 1980No. 191, Docket 79-6090PublishedCited by 348 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

Upon ratification of the Constitution, the thirteen former colonies were fused into a single nation, one which, in its relations ■with foreign states, is bound both to observe and construe /the accepted norms of international law, formerly known as thé law of nations. Under the Articles of Confederation, the several states had interpreted and applied this body of doctrine as a part of their common law, but with the founding of the “more perfect Union” of 1789, the law of nations became preeminently a federal concern.

Implementing the constitutional mandate for…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by348 opinions

  1. Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Hernandez v. MesaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Sinaltrainal v. Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

343 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API