Legal Opinion

Houston v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 24, 1973No. 45579PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for burglary. After the jury returned a verdict of guilty, punishment was assessed by the court at eight years.

Appellant urges that the court erred when if failed to accord court-appointed counsel ten days to prepare for trial.

The record reflects that counsel was appointed on October 21, 1971, and that the case was tried on October 26, 1971.

Article 26.04(b), Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., provides:

“The appointed counsel is entitled to ten days to prepare for trial, but may waive the time by written notice, signed by the counsel and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  2. Steward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
  3. Ex Parte MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1964
  5. Meeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Henson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Marin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  5. Ditto v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API