Henson v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ODOM, Judge.
The offense was burglary; the punishment, enhanced under Art. 63, V.A.P.C., confinement for life.
The sole ground of error raised by appellant’s appointed attorney is without merit. Our reading of the record, however, reveals a violation of the mandatory provisions of Art. 26.04, V.A.C.C.P. In the interest of justice, we will consider such violation as unassigned error, Art. 40.09(13), V.A.C.C.P., as we did in Crothers v. State, 480 S.W.2d 642.
The record reflects that appellant was initially indicted for burglary. Trial counsel was appointed on May 10, 1973. The State later…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Brumfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Elizalde v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Marin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ashcraft v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
- Duhamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Lujan v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.