Legal Opinion

Daniel Olson v. California Adult Authority

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 18, 1970No. 24635_1PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Per curiam

Daniel Olson, appellant herein, a California state prisoner, filed a civil rights action against the California Adult Authority in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. He complains that he has not been released on parole and that the rules of the California Adult Authority governing hearings before the parole board deny him due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

The district court dismissed the action with prejudice on the ground that the “plaintiff has failed to state a claim against the named defendant.” We agree.

Treating the action as one…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Charles Allison v. California Adult AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Frank Hale Bennett v. People of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Homer K. Morehead v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Limmie West, III v. State of LouisianaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. Billiteri v. United States Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. Samuel v. University of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Billiteri v. United States Board Of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  5. Robinson v. California Board of Prison TermsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API