Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Dietz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 26, 1926No. Appeal, 19PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

Defendants, Arthur M. Dietz and Jacob H. Dietz, have appealed from what is known as a “padlocking order,” of the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, that certain property in the City of Pittsburgh shall not “be occupied or used for any purpose for one year” from the date of the decree, June, 1925.

Arthur M. Dietz was the proprietor of and conducted a barroom on the premises in question, of which Jacob H. Dietz was the landlord; whiskey and other intoxicating liquors were sold for beverage purposes in this barroom; defendants were notified by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kariher's Petition (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Byers & Davis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1862
  3. Evans v. Reading Chemical Fertilizing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. Van Swartow v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1854
  5. Nolan v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Shumaker v. New York & Pennsylvania Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Commonwealth v. United Food Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Premier Cereal & Beverage Co. v. Pennsylvania Alcohol Permit BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Stewart v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Commonwealth v. KramerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API