Legal Opinion

Roshan v. Nouri (In Re Nouri)

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 2003No. Bankruptcy No. 5-02-00205. Adversary No. 5-02-00090APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION 1

JOHN J. THOMAS, Chief Judge.

Background

This adversary proceeding requires the Court to determine whether certain obligations imposed by an equitable distribution order (“Order”) are dischargeable under section 523(a)(15) of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”). In order to better understand this situation, it’s necessary to begin at its inception.

Vida Roshan (“Plaintiff’) and Mohamad Nouri (“Debtor”) were married in September 1981. Two children were born from this union. 2 Both parties spent a large portion of their marriage living abroad before settling in the United States and eventually…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Patterson v. ShumateSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. In Re Robert Frank-Leonard Wilson, Debtor. Lisa Baldino v. Robert Frank-Leonard Wilson Bunce D. Atkinson, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Hill v. Hill (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mannix v. Mannix (In Re Mannix)District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Crawford v. Hertzberg (In re Hertzberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Denillo v. Iron & Glass Bank (In Re Denillo)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API