Legal Opinion

George v. Alexander

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1996No. 01S01-9505-CV-00084PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

In this medical malpractice ease, the plaintiff, Ethel Faye George, appeals from the Court of Appeals’ affirmance of a judgment based on a jury verdict in favor of the defendants, Clyde Wayne Alexander, M.D. and Phillip R. Jones, M.D. This ease presents the following issue for our determination: whether a defendant in a negligence case must, pursuant to Rule 8.03 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure, plead comparative fault as an affirmative defense if the defendant wishes to introduce evidence that a person other than itself caused the plaintiffs injury. We…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kilpatrick v. BryantTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Ridings v. Ralph M. Parsons Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Church v. PeralesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Snyder v. LTG Lufttechnische GmbHTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Waste Management, Inc. v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Godbee v. DimickCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  5. Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Wal-Mart Discount CitiesTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API