Commonwealth v. Furness
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
MUSMANNO, J.:
Paul Furness (“Furness”) appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following his convictions for criminal trespass, attempted burglary, and possessing instruments of crime. 1 We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for resentencing.
The trial court set forth the relevant facts as follows:
On July 20, 2012, at approximately 10:00 a.m., Christopher Babiarz [ (“Babiarz”) ] saw [Furness] attempt to enter his home, located at 3170 Richmond Street, [Philadelphia,] through the window. On that morning, [Babiarz] heard “some rustling and banging at the back door” and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. TalbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. SanchezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Com. v. Basnet, Y.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Com. v. Bernarsky, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
- Com. v. Brown, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Com. v. Burns, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Coyne, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.