Hill v. Fontaine Condominium Association, Inc
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Justice.
Hill rented an apartment in the Fontaine complex when its occupancy was advertised as limited to adults only. He later purchased a unit when the complex was converted to condominiums. Subsequent to his purchase, the condominium association passed an amendment to its declaration restricting permanent residence to persons 16 years old or older. Hill, who was present at this meeting and voted against the amendment, had no children then. Two years later, Hill’s wife gave birth to his son. When the condominium association advised Hill that it intended to enforce the restriction,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'CONNOR v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Riley v. StovesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Ritchey v. Villa Nueva Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Wills v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Jackson v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schmidt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Woodside Village Condominium Association, Inc. v. JahrenSupreme Court of Florida · 2002
- Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. SadriWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- McElveen-Hunter v. Fountain Manor Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Flagler Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Crestview Towers Condominium Ass'n, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.