Legal Opinion

Goldin v. Shankroff

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 29, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Judgment unanimously reversed upon the law, with thirty dollars costs to appellant, and complaint dismissed, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Plaintiff was not a licensed broker at the time of rendering the services in question. Under sections 440-442-1 of the Real Property Law (as added by Laws of 1922, chap. 672) it is made a crime for a person to render services as a broker for compensation without being licensed. By thus violating the law, plaintiff could not obtain a right to commissions. (Morgan Munitions Co. v. Stude*823baker Corporation, 226 N. Y. 94, 99.) That plaintiff was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan Munitions Supply Co. v. Studebaker Corporation of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. William Stake & Co. v. RothAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
  3. Roman v. LobeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Irons Investment Co. v. RichardsonWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANY v. ReddickOregon Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API