Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Dissent · RodowskyRodowsky, Judge
I respectfully dissent based on the substance of the reasons presented in the dissenting opinion by Judge Chasanow.
2Dissent · ChasanowChasanow, Judge
Tragic cases may have tragic consequences when sympathy for a plaintiff interferes with a court’s ability to analyze the facts and apply the law. Sympathy for the victim of a tragedy should not serve as a substitute for evidence of duty, culpability, and proximate cause. The legal issue in this case is whether a landlord should have to pay over five million dollars solely because the landlord did not make a futile attempt to evict a tenant whose dog barked and growled at…
3Cases cited58 opinions
- Jacques v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Peterson v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hartford Insurance v. Manor Inn of Bethesda, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Uccello v. LaudenslayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.