Legal Opinion

COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. KOCH

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 2018No. S17G0654PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

303 Ga. 336

FINAL COPY S17G0654. COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY v. KOCH et al. NAHMIAS, Justice. This Court granted a writ of certiorari to determine whether the Court of Appeals in Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. v. Koch,

339 Ga. App. 357

( 793 SE2d 564) (2016), properly articulated the legal standard for when a plaintiff’s duty to preserve evidence begins and properly applied that standard to the facts of this case. Like a defendant’s duty, a plaintiff’s duty to preserve relevant evidence in her control arises when that party actually anticipates or reasonably should anticipate litigation. Because the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mark N. Silvestri v. General Motors Corporation, Dfendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  2. Chin v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  3. Bryant Flury v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. Sylla-Sawdon v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Phillips v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. The ANTHEM COMPANIES, INC. v. CHERYL WILLSSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Anthem Cos. v. WillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Wilkins v. City of Conyers.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  4. JORDAN v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. Marriott International, Inc. v. Jordan.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  5. ANTHONY v. BARBAALVAREZDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2022

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API