Legal Opinion

Cockrell v. Cockrell

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 27, 2014No. 2013-CA-00031-COAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FAIR, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. This appeal arises from alimony proceedings between Carl and Joyce Cock-*768rell. Joyce filed a complaint in the Chancery Court of Oktibbeha County, seeking arrearages of alimony with pre-judgment interest, a finding of contempt, and attorney’s fees. Carl filed a counter-complaint for modification, to eliminate his alimony obligation. The chancellor adjudicated a material change in Carl’s circumstances and ordered a downward modification of alimony. Recognizing Joyce was receiving $557 in Social Security benefits based on Carl’s earnings, the chancellor reduced alimony…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ArmstrongMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Sanderson v. SandersonMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  3. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Chatman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Steiner v. SteinerMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dixon v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API