Legal Opinion
Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Arnold
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 31, 1939No. 13890PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
' BROWN, Justice.
This is a workmen’s compensation suit, and the principal basis for recovery is the fact that the employee, Arnold, who is defendant in error, sustained a double hernia while engaged in the performance of the duties for which he was employed. The jury found that the employee was totally and permanently incapacitated and judgment was therefore rendered for him for 401 weeks.
The cause having been appealed to the Cpurt of Civil. Appeals for the Texarkana District, same -was transferred by the Supreme Court to this Court.
There are some 46 assignments of error, supported by 20…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Security Mut. Casualty Co. v. BoltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Federal Underwriters Exchange v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Traders & General Insurance v. BulisTexas Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Southern Underwriters v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- United Employers Casualty Co. v. MarrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. EbersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. PiersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.