Legal Opinion
Putnam v. The United States Army Review Board Agency
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 2023No. 5:22-cv-00305-GUnknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA LT. COL. (RET.) JOE A. PUTNAM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-22-305-G ) UNITED STATES ARMY ) REVIEW BOARD AGENCY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Now before the Court is Defendant United States Army Review Board Agency (“ARBA”)’s Motion (Doc. No. 15), seeking dismissal of or summary judgment upon the claims raised by Plaintiff Lt. Col. (Ret.) Joe A. Putnam in his Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 14). Plaintiff has responded (Doc. No. 18), Defendant has filed a Reply (Doc. No. 24), and the matter is now at issue. I. Background In this…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Carl Oglesby v. The United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.