Legal Opinion

Penn Bridge Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1930No. H-95PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

The plaintiff brings this suit to recover $16,434.70, which it alleges is due it for increased wages paid on work done for defendant under a written contract.

The evidence shows without dispute that the plaintiff entered into a written contract to furnish certain machinery and erect the same in the navy yards of the defendant for a fixed price, and the contract also provided:

“ If, after the date of the contract, there shall be any increase in the rates of wages prevailing in the vicinity of a place where work contemplated by the contract is done, that shall necessitate payment by the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  2. Austin Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  3. John P. Moriarty, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  4. Electric Boat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API