Legal Opinion
Penn Bridge Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 1, 1930No. H-95PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge
The plaintiff brings this suit to recover $16,434.70, which it alleges is due it for increased wages paid on work done for defendant under a written contract.
The evidence shows without dispute that the plaintiff entered into a written contract to furnish certain machinery and erect the same in the navy yards of the defendant for a fixed price, and the contract also provided:
“ If, after the date of the contract, there shall be any increase in the rates of wages prevailing in the vicinity of a place where work contemplated by the contract is done, that shall necessitate payment by the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Austin Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
- John P. Moriarty, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
- Electric Boat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1935