Legal Opinion

Application of Hoff

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1964No. 4756PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, J.:

This is an original habeas corpus proceeding. The petitioner, an indigent, was convicted of grand larceny in the district court. He now asks to be released from prison, contending that, as he was without counsel at the preliminary hearing, his present confinement is illegal. Here, as in Victoria v. Young, 80 Nev. 279, 392 P.2d 509, the petitioner mainly relies upon Hamilton v. Alabama, 368 U. S. 52; Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335; and White v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 59. In Victoria v. Young, supra, we distinguished those cases and held that a preliminary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Hamilton v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Pinana v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Overton v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garnick v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. GortarezArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. SchumacherArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. United States ex rel. Morford v. HockerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API