Legal Opinion

Stoner v. Riggs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Genesee; Wisner, J. Assumpsit by Cicero J. K. Stoner against Fred F. Riggs for services performed and moneys expended. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The plaintiff brought this action against his wife’s father, an incompetent, under guardianship, serving process upon the defendant. . His guardian entered his appearance as attorney and guardian, and conducted the defense, and appears in this appeal. The items for which plaintiff claims a right to recover grow out of dealings which plaintiff alleges to be mutual. They are given in the bill of particulars, as follows:

This action is brought to recover the balance of the following account:

*131For services rendered from October 27, 1877, to July 30,1894, in oaring for the property, both real and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. White v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Campbell v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. King v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1851
  5. Lester v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuerbringer v. HermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Erwin v. FayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Cohen v. Home Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  4. King v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  5. Landwehr v. Holland City State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API