Legal Opinion

Fuerbringer v. Herman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1923No. Docket No. 145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Tuscola; Williams (William B.), J., presiding. Assumpsit by Ralph O. Fuerbringer against Peter Herman for services rendered. Judgment for plaintiff on a directed verdict. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Plaintiff, a physician, on July 1, 1922, commenced this action to recover a bill for medicines and for services rendered to defendant, his wife, and his son. Defendant pleaded the general issue, with notice of the statute of limitations. Plaintiff had judgment on verdict directed by the court for the full amount of the bill and interest, $672.90. Defendant brings error.

Plaintiff began treating defendant’s wife and son in October, 1914, and continued until August, 1915. The first entry of the bill for such services and for medicines furnished is dated October 6, 1914, and'the last entry…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. White v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Campbell v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Kimball v. KimballMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Borden v. Fletcher's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Goodsole v. JefferyMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Bryant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Hansen v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Johnson v. Meade's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API