Legal Opinion

Brittany Lacey v. WhiteRecon Logistics, LLC, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 25, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02847Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRITTANY LACEY, No. 2:25-cv-02847-DAD-ICD 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 14 WHITERECON LOGISTICS, LLC, et al., (Doc. No. 3) 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. 18 (Doc. No. 3.) On November 10, 2026, the pending motion was taken under submission on the 19 papers pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. No. 12.) For the reasons below, the court will grant 20 defendants’ motion to dismiss pursuant to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  5. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API