Legal Opinion
In Re Interest of Forrester
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 20, 2003No. 161 MAP 2001PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Chief Justice CAPPY.
The issue with which we are presented today is whether the Commonwealth Court erred in determining that there is no requirement that the Agricultural Lands Condemnation Approval Board (“ALCAB”) must approve of the opening of a private road under the law commonly known as the Private Road Act (“Act”), 36 P.S. § 2731 et seq., when that road is in *367an Agricultural Security Area (“ASA”). For the following reasons, we affirm.
Robert W. Forrester (“Appellee”) owns a twenty-acre tract of land in Franklin County that is landlocked.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buffalo Township v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Philadelphia Clay Co. v. York Clay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Washington Park, Inc. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Opening a Private Road for the Benefit of O'ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- In re Private Road in Speers Boro, IISupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'ReillyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re Condemnation of Land for the South East Central Business District Redevelopment Area 1Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- O'Reilly v. (a) Hickory On Green Homeowners Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.