Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Robb
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 2000No. 20000096PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1] Disciplinary Counsel objects to the Disciplinary Board’s dismissal of a petition for discipline against Thomas W. Robb. We hold Disciplinary Counsel has proven by clear and convincing evidence Robb violated N.D.R. Prof. Conduct 1.15(a) and 5.5(a). We reverse the Disciplinary Board’s dismissal and suspend Robb for a period of one year.
I
[¶ 2] In 1996, Robb began representing Amber Leno in a divorce case and a personal injury case. Robb sent a letter dated January 81, 1997, to the district court regarding the value of Leno’s and her husband’s property under N.D.R.Ct. 8.3.
[¶ 3] In early…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. BougheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Disciplinary Action Against AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Disciplinary Board v. RobbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. HawkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. RobbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.