Legal Opinion

Farmers Royalty Holding Co. v. Hahn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 1, 1945No. 11683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MONTEITH, Chief Justice.

This action was brought by appellants, Farmers Royalty Holding Company et al., in statutory form of trespass to try title, for the recovery from appellees, Otto Hahn and wife, of an undivided 1/2 interest in •the mineral estate in a tract of 173 acres of land situated in Austin County. By supplemental petition appellants pled that they were entitled to recover the mineral interests in said land under the after-acquired title rule.

Appellees answered by general denial and plea of not guilty and other defense pleas.

In a trial before the court without a jury judgment was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. W. T. Caswell v. Llano Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cherry v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Farmers Royalty Holding Co. v. CherryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hahn v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API