Farmers Royalty Holding Co. v. Cherry
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
CODY, Justice.
The primary question for determination in this case is whether, under the facts here presented, the rule — that a title subsequently acquired to land-by a grantor, who had previously conveyed an interest therein under warranty of title, passes eo irstante to the grantee — is here applicable.
The facts here presented are these: Dan Webel and wife owned the land involved in this suit, subject to the outstanding superior title and vendor’s lien securing notes given by said owners as the purchase price for said land (which notes and security were owned by one. William Kemper, at the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baldwin v. RootTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Leonard v. Benfford Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
- Breen v. MoreheadTexas Supreme Court · 1911
- Robinson v. DouthitTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- W. T. Caswell v. Llano Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cherry v. Farmers Royalty Holding Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Farmers Royalty Holding Co. v. KulowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Frels v. SchuetteCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Farmers Royalty Holding Co. v. HahnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Emilio Romero and Linda K. Romero v. Stewart Title Guaranty, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2015