Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hernandez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1986No. 69320PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

This is a postconviction habeas corpus proceeding pursuant to Article 11.07, V.A. C.C.P. Facts of the matter are undisputed. The sole issue is one of law.

In April 1982 applicant pleaded guilty to a charge of indecency with a child, and in accordance with Article 42.12, § 3d(a), V.A. C.C.P., the trial court found evidence substantiated guilt, deferred further proceedings without entering an adjudication of guilt and placed applicant on “probation.” In May 1983 the State moved to set aside the deferred adjudication order, alleging three violations of a condition of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Galitz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. McDougal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Beedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Dillehey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Shortt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API