Legal Opinion

Rosecrance v. Rosecrance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1901PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Ingham; Wiest, J. Bill by Stella Rosecrance against Scott Rosecrance for a divorce. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

The complainant has appealed from a decree denying her a divorce in a pro confesso case. The important testimony was given by herself, and her husband, the defendant, was called by order of the court. A decree was denied by the court upon two grounds:

First. That, “ considering complainant’s testimony, and viewing the manner in which she gave it, I cannot say that it satisfies me clearly, and I decline to make a judicial determination that it proves the cause for divorce alleged in the bill.”

Second. “ The complainant has not made a case. The statute provides (section 8652, 3 Comp. Laws),…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dawson v. DawsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Murphy v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Heaton v. HeatonMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Steere v. SteereWyoming Supreme Court · 1954
  5. White v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API