Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Heaton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1915No. Docket No. 135PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Kalamazoo; Weimer, J. Bill by Amy H. Heaton against Ryan Heaton for divorce. From a decree for defendant, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the complainant’s bill for a divorce. The proofs in support of the charge of extreme cruelty, which is the cause assigned in the bill, rest solely upon the testimony of the complainant herself, and the chancellor refused to grant the relief because in his opinion the case had not been clearly established in accordance with the rule announced by this court in Murphy v. Murphy, 150 Mich. 97 (113 N. W. 583).

Recognizing the rule that this court ought not to lightly reverse a decree made under such conditions where the chancellor, who has seen and heard…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Rosecrance v. RosecranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Knickerbocker v. KnickerbockerMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Murphy v. MurphyMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. White v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brookhouse v. BrookhouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kolberg v. KolbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Klumpp v. KlumppMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Cendeck v. CendeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API