Legal Opinion

CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOC. v. Faugno

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 7, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

839 A.2d 95 (2004)

365 N.J. Super. 313

CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff,

v.

Paul FAUGNO and Rogan & Faugno, Defendants-Appellants/Third-Party Plaintiffs,

v.

Harleysville Insurance Company of New Jersey, Timothy Tuttle, Robert J. Mancinelli and Carver & Mancinelli, Third-Party Defendants/Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 15, 2003.

Decided January 7, 2004.

Lance J. Kalik, Morristown, argued the cause for appellants Paul Faugno and Rogan & Faugno (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, attorneys; Glenn A. Clark, of counsel; Mr. Kalik, Mr. Clark and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Markey v. SkogNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  2. Holloway v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
  3. LaBRACIO FAM. PARTNERSHIP v. 1239 Roosevelt Ave., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. State v. Cruz Const. Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Tomkovich v. Public Service Coord. Transp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cherry Hill Manor Associates v. FaugnoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API