Legal Opinion

State v. Boag

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1990No. 17659PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTERS, Chief Judge.

A jury found Gerald Boag guilty of grand theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403, -2407. Boag appeals, arguing that the district court erred by refusing to grant, his motion for acquittal due to insufficient evidence on the record to sustain the verdict. Boag also contends the trial court erred in failing to correctly instruct the jury as to Boag’s defense to the charge. We conclude that the court did not err in its instructions to the jury. We also find there was sufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict; consequently, the trial court did not err in denying Boag’s motion for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. CampbellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. AragonIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. FenleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. HolderIdaho Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BronnenbergIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State v. GroceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. MedinaIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. HickmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. VandenacreIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API