Legal Opinion
Fayard v. Northeast Vehicle Services, LLC
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 14, 2008No. 07-2222PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Northeast Vehicle Services, LLC, East Brookfield & Spencer Railroad, LLC (“EB & SR”); Holston Land Company, Inc., CSX Real Property, Inc., Steven Pugliese, and George Bell all play various roles in the ownership and operation of an automobile distribution facility located in the towns of East Brookfield and Spencer, Massachusetts. 1 Plaintiffs, Leo and Sara Fayard, own a seventeen-acre farm in East Brookfield that abuts the rail line that services the facility.
In December 2006, the Fayards filed suit in Massachusetts state court asserting claims against the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Turek v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Town of Atherton v. California High-Speed Rail AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Huston v. FLS Language CentresDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Griffioen v. Cedar Rapids & Iowa City Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.