Legal Opinion

United MacHinery Co. v. Etzel

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 10, 1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action to recover damages for the alleged wrongful refusal of the defendants to accept and pay for certain machinery, pursuant to their contract with the plaintiff, brought to and tried by the City Court of New Haven, Booth, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the plaintiff for 8385, and appeal by the defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and defendants entered into a written contract for the purchase and sale of one thirteen-inch Rogers secondhand moulder, f. o. b. New Haven boat at New York City, at the agreed price of $350; the plaintiff agreeing to allow $175 in part payment for certain other machinery to be shipped by the defendants to the plaintiff. It also alleges the shipment and delivery in good condition, and the refusal of the defendants to pay any part of the purchase price, either in money or by shipment of the other machinery.

The defendants’ answer, as amended, admits the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crompton v. BeachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  2. Appleton v. Norwalk Library Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
  3. Beach's Appeal from CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. First National Bank of Webster v. AltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bead Chain Manufacturing Co. v. Saxton Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Hartlin v. CodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  3. Sager v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. General Electric Contracts Corp. v. BandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API