Sager v. Schmidt
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action by the payee against the maker of a promissory note for $300, brought to and tried by the Court of Common Pleas in Litchfield County, Woodruff, J.; the court nonsuited the plaintiff, and from its refusal to set aside such judgment the plaintiff appealed. Error and new trial ordered.
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The note sued on was in the following form:—
“$300.00 Maybrook, N. Y., June 25, 1921.
One month after date I promise to pay to the order of Herman Sager Three Hundred Dollars at the First Nat’l. Bank of Maybrook. This note is given for Bal. on 1916 Elgin Touring Car Motor No. A1205-Series 159. It is expressly understood and agreed that the title and ownership of said property does not pass until this note and interest thereon and all renewals of this note shall have been paid in full, and said Herman Sager is the owner of said property until same is paid and said Herman Sager may take…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beach's Appeal from CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
- Gray v. BoothAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- O'neill-Adams Co. v. EklundSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- United MacHinery Co. v. EtzelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Taylor v. EsselstynAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Joyce Shirley v. State National Bank of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Boland v. Essex County Bank and Trust CompanyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
- Hartlin v. CodySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Ghirardelli v. Peninsula Properties Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Colonial Finance Co. v. BrodskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.