Legal Opinion
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Goldstene
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 29, 2011No. Case Nos. CV-F-09-2234 LJO GSA, CV-F-10-163 LJO DLBPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION (Doc. 138)
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
Introduction
To implement provisions of California Assembly Bill 32 (“AB 32”), California’s Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006, Cal. Health & Saf.Code, § 38500 et seq., defendant California Air Resource Board (“CARB”) promulgated its Low Carbon Fuel Standard, Cal.Code Regs. tit. 17, §§ 95480-95490 (“LCFS”). Plaintiffs1 ini*1047tiated separate actions to challenge California’s LCFS. Plaintiffs challenge the LCFS. Plaintiffs assert that the LCFS is prohibited by the dormant Commerce Clause and is preempted by…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Poet v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. CoreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- POET v. Air Resources Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.