State v. Haberek
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKrupansky, J.
Defendant-appellant James F. Haberek and Kathleen Skube were indicted on April 22, 1986 for theft in office, R.C. 2921.41, and possession of criminal tools, R.C. 2923.24. Defendants elected to waive a jury. In the midst of trial Skube entered a plea and defendant Haberek, after trial, was found guilty of the charges set forth in the indictment on February 27, 1987.
On appeal, Haberek sets forth five assignments of error challenging various constitutional and procedural issues. The assignments of error are without merit. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.
On October 2, 1985 Walter Shipka…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Holloway v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. LeonardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Jones v. BradshawDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
- State v. WarrenOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.