Legal Opinion

Muir v. Shick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 24, 1940No. 29400PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, J.

This action was instituted in the district court of Kingfisher county by Carl W. Shick, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against Rose Muir, executrix of the last will and testament of H. W. Shick, deceased, wherein plaintiff sought to recover the value of services performed for the said H. W. Shick, deceased, during his lifetime. Issues were joined, the cause was tried to a jury and a verdict was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $1,100. From a judgment thereon, defendant has appealed.

Among other assignments of error, it is urged that the plaintiff’s cause of action was barred…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Engelbrecht v. HerringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Patterson v. BonnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Miller v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Poole v. JanovySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Smith v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Tulsa Tribune Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  2. Norris v. NorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API