Legal Opinion
Rayborn v. Mississippi State Board of Dental Examiners
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided January 15, 1985No. Civ. A. No. J81-0488(B)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
In this civil action, Plaintiffs, Denturists 1 and dental laboratory technicians allegedly studying to be denturists, seek damages and injunctive and declaratory relief against the Mississippi State Board of Dental Examiners (hereinafter “Dental Board”) and its individual members. In the five count Amended Complaint, the Plaintiffs attack the constitutionality of the Mississippi Dental Practice Act (hereinafter “Dental Act”) — Sections 73-9-1 through 73-9-65 of Mississippi Code Annotated of 1972.2 — and seek damages and injunctive relief…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local 610 v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pro-Choice Mississippi v. FordiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Wiser v. STATE, DEPT. OF COMMERCEMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Kirk FordiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
- Rayborn v. MISS. STATE BD. OF DENTAL EXAMINERSDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1985