Raja v. Raja

OPINION SUR RULE 46 OF THE SUPERIOR COURT

LAGAKOS, J.,

The plaintiff in this matter filed a complaint in divorce a.v.m. on December 17, 1968. Service was properly made on defendant, a master was appointed by this court and the master held a full hearing to determine the facts and duly made his finding. Defendant subsequently filed exceptions to the master’s report and the matter is now before this court. After careful and independent consid*73eration of the evidence, the court accepts the master’s findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Plaintiff based his complaint on two separate grounds,…