Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Custer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1941No. Appeal, 201PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Keller, P. J.,
Opinion by
The defendant, Pearson Custer, has appealed from his conviction on an indictment charging adultery. In lieu of the evidence introduced at the trial before President Judge Boose and a jury, counsel have submitted an agreed statement of facts under Rule 56 of this court. It is as follows:
“Pearson Custer and Alverda Shultz were married in Somerset County on the 31st day of October, 1926. After their marriage, they resided in Somerset County for six years, during which time they became the parents of tivo children. On or about the first of September, 1932, Pearson Custer…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Haddock v. HaddockSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nixon v. NixonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Atherton v. AthertonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Esenwein v. EsenweinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Maurer v. MaurerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Jewett v. JewettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Keating v. KeatingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. CaseBucks County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.