Legal Opinion
Pringle v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 5, 2000No. 99-3139PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-appellant Julius Pringle appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his complaint brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80 (FTCA). The district court determined that it lacked jurisdiction under the rule in Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950). We agree and affirm. 1
1. Relevant Facts
At the time of the events giving rise to his complaint, appellant was on active duty-in the United States Army. He was seriously injured while on the premises of Club Troopers, a club located on the Fort Riley Military Reservation.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- Radil v. Sanborn Western Camps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Sizova v. National Institute of Standards & TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Baker v. USD 229 Blue ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Paper, Allied-Industrial, Chemical & Energy Workers International Union v. Continental Carbon Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Costo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.