Legal Opinion

Smith v. United Fuel Gas Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1932No. 7368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lively, Judge:

Plaintiffs own twenty-two twenty-fourths (22/24) undivided interest in a tract of 239 acres in Clay county which they leased to defendant United Fuel Gas Company for oil and gas explorations. One twenty-fourth (1/24) undivided interest in the land is owned by defendant Bella Adkins, who likewise leased her interest for oil and gas purposes which lease was acquired and operated by defendant Barnhart, who is represented in this suit by his committee, Maude Barnhart. The other one twenty-fourth (1/24) undivided interest in the land is owned by defendant gas company.

The Bella Adkins…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williamson v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. South Penn Oil Co. v. HaughtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cecil v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Cecil v. ClarkWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Provident Life & Trust Co. v. WoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Swartzbaugh v. SampsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Thaxton v. BeardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Smith v. United Fuel Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Antero Resources Corporation v. Elwanda J. Pike, in her capacity as representative of the Estate of Rufus Fordyce Pike, John Kent Pike, Jr., Daniel Edward Pike, James P. Moffitt, Tanya L. Yoho, Ted Arthur McCullough, Robert A. Borchers, Ritchie Petroleum Corporation, AMP Fund III, LP, and Diversified Production LLC, successor in interest to Alliance Petroleum Co. LLC (Judge White, concurring in part and dissenting in part)Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API