Legal Opinion
Klein v. Menke
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1968No. File 10526PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOMEYER, Judge.
The Industrial Commissioner denied the claim of Victor M. Klein for workmen's compensation benefits on the ground that it was barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal to the circuit court, the Commissioner was reversed and the matter remanded to him for consideration on its merits. The employer and his insurer have appealed to this court.
Claimant-respondent sustained an injury by accident on September 21, 1964, while roping a calf on the ranch of his employer, Fred Menke. He was immediately taken to the office of Dr. Robert H. Hayes at Winner by his employer. Dr. Hayes…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Young v. Sonoco Products Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Middleton v. City of WatertownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- General Accident Fire & Life Assur. Corp. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Lang v. Jordan Stone Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- TEGEKS v. Western Chevrolet Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Moody v. LW Tyler, Custom CombinersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Citibank, N.A. v. South Dakota Department of RevenueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Hyatt v. Harvest States and National Union FireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Dakota Truck Underwriters v. South Dakota Subsequent Injury FundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.