J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. Souders
Indiana Court of Appeals
Prom Superior Court of Tippecanoe County; Henry H. Vinton, Judge. Action by the J. I. Case Threshing Machine Company against Prank T. Souders. Prom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Appellee, who was defendant below, purchased a threshing outfit from appellant, the terms being evidenced by a written contract. The only part of the contract involved in this appeal is the following stipulation:
“In consideration of the expense incurred by the company in soliciting, investigating and taking this order, the purchaser promises and agrees to pay all freight charges on said machinery from the factory, and fifteen per cent of the price above stipulated in cash, in case he cancels this order or declines to accept said machinery. ’ ’
The purchase price of the machinery was $2,475.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seeman v. BiemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Bird v. St. John's Episcopal Church of ElkhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Jaqua v. HeadingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Merica v. BurgetIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. McEwenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burley Tobacco Society v. GillaspyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Zenor v. PryorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Eikenberry v. ThornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916