Legal Opinion
Dashiell v. USA 2255
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 28, 2024No. 1:24-cv-01450Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA * v. * Crim. No. MJM-21-120 Civ. No. MJM-24-1450 RICO KENDALL DASHIELL, * Petitioner. * * * * * * * * * * * MEMORANDUM Petitioner Rico Kendall Dashiell (“Petitioner”) filed a Motion to Vacate Judgment Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 205. Respondent United States (the “Government”) filed a response opposing the motion. ECF No. 218. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted. See Rule 8(a), Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings for the United States Dist. Cts.; Loc. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2023). For the reasons…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.