Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Clara's Parlor, Inc.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2007No. 130847PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

728 N.W.2d 855 (2007)

Guadalupe RUIZ, Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

CLARA'S PARLOR, INC., and Department of Labor & Economic Growth, Unemployment Insurance Agency, Respondents-Appellees.

Docket No. 130847. COA No. 264833.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 23, 2007.

MARILYN J. KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal.

MARKMAN, J., not participating.

2Concurrence · WeaverWeaver, J.

I concur in the order denying leave to appeal. I write separately to note that Justice Markman has disqualified himself from this case and has supplied no reasons for his decision not to participate.

Although I specifically requested Justice Markman's reasons for…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Weaver.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re JKMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  2. James M. Scott, Jr. v. Robert C. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  4. People v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Grievance Administrator v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ansari v. GoldMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Flemister v. TRAVELING MEDICAL SERVICES, PCMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. McDowell v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Tate v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API