Legal Opinion

Grievance Administrator v. Fieger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2006No. 127547PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The respondent-appellee’s motion for a stay of proceedings is denied.

This Court previously determined in this case that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution does not bar the application of the Michigan Rules of Professional Conduct to statements made by respondent-attorney Geoffrey Fieger in the course of a pending lawsuit in the Court of Appeals. Specifically, Mr. Fieger stated that he “declared war upon” the judges hearing his lawsuit, that such judges could “kiss his ass,” that his client should “shove [his finger] up their asses,” that they were “three jackass Court of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Red Star Motor Drivers' Ass'n v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. ParsonsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ruiz v. Clara's Parlor, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. FiegerMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Ansari v. GoldMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Neal v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API