Legal Opinion

Teasley v. Hermann Companies, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 22, 2005No. CA 04-439PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Bird, Judge.

This one-brief appeal arises from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission denying appellant and appellees’ joint motion that the Commission approve a twenty-five percent attorney’s fee to be paid by appellant’s medical service providers on the total amount of his medical bills. Appellant, Joseph Teasley, contends that the Commission erred as a matter oflaw in finding that his attorney was not entitled to attorney’s fees based upon the value of medical services provided to appellant. The case is one of first impression and requires statutory interpretation of Ark.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. American Standard Travelers Indemnity Co. v. PostCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Jones Truck Lines v. PendergrassCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Auto Parts & Tire Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Death & Permanent Total Disability Trust Fund v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  3. Curt Bean Transport, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Landers v. Arkansas Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
  5. Mohammed v. Maverick TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API